Comments on: Cisco: The basics about VRF implementation

By: Jayaprakash (Jp)

Jayaprakash (Jp) — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:48:00 +0000

Good basics.
Thanks

By: Egelling

Egelling — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:22:00 +0000

I would share it ,but the people I know r stupid

By: Awaghmode

Awaghmode — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:08:00 +0000

good info

By: Ahmed

Ahmed — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:18:00 +0000

many thanks

By: anuj tyagi

anuj tyagi — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:24:00 +0000

thanks ! It was useful how to configure vrf on cisco router

By: Aimen

Aimen — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:58:10 +0000

Thank you, this was greate and helped me to understand the baiscs of VRF

By: Jim

Jim — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:51:56 +0000

It's too bad Cisco chose to hack VRF into every single command that has to do with routing. That smells like a kludgy patch retro-fit. Now we always have to remember to tack the "vrf vrf-name" parameter onto everything! What they should have done is allow you to switch into a named VRF context, then from inside that do anything you would with a normal "physical" router, including show and config t. Oh well, gotta play the hand we're dealt I suppose.

By: Tamekia Arrowsmith

Tamekia Arrowsmith — Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:20:16 +0000

The difficulty using Plr content is buyers do not make use of it effectively. People ought to either make use of it to find suggestions for things to write about or entirely re-write it or spin and rewrite it and afterward put his or her own identify on it.

By: how to hide ip address

how to hide ip address — Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:13:51 +0000

What type of VPN? Many commercial clients such as Cisco have a setting that does just that. If you’re trying to do it with the Microsoft vpn connection, you’ll have to set it up as a service.

By: S Siva

S Siva — Mon, 31 May 2010 06:14:54 +0000

Hi, Excellent explanation.. I just spotted one mistake, in point #3, it should say route-target {import/export/both} route-target-ext-community and not route-distinguiser… thats just a typo though… very well written. Thanks,

Siva