<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FirstDigest &#187; Cisco-routing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstdigest.com/category/routingandswitching/cisco-routing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstdigest.com</link>
	<description>Technical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RIPv2 MD5 authentication &#8211; routing trick</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/ripv2-md5-authentication-routing-trick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/ripv2-md5-authentication-routing-trick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authetication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[md5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIPv2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[route deny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=3387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I must admit that the following example is more a CCIE exam topic and not a solution that you would add in real network environments.</p> <p>Let&#8217;s assume that we have the following topology:</p> <p><a href="http://cdn.firstdigest.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/RIPv2.jpeg" rel="lightbox[3387]"></a></p> <p> <br /> The Loopback interfaces are there to have some networks which we will advertise into RIPv2. The request for this topic is to have RIPv2 MD5 authentication in place, Router1 to receive all routes from Router2, but Router2 will not have any prefixes in routing table from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/ripv2-md5-authentication-routing-trick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>InterVLAN routing using Private VLANs</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/intervlan-routing-using-private-vlans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/intervlan-routing-using-private-vlans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco-switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco private-vlan intervlan routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervlan routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private vlan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private vlan configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private vlan routing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=3363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Private VLANs  is one possible solutions for service providers to offer secure connections to their customers and avoid inter-vlan communication in the same switched environment.</p> <p>I&#8217;m sure that you heard (and most probably practice already) InterVLAN routing. When it comes to Private VLANs the routing part may be a bit tricky. Keep in mind that this is not something that I would recommend to use as a standard in a productive environment, but for things like Cisco exams (e.g. CCIE R&#38;S) or last resort solution, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/intervlan-routing-using-private-vlans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Easy VPN Router-to-Router</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/cisco-easy-vpn-router-to-router/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/cisco-easy-vpn-router-to-router/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco-security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easyvpn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ezvpn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how-to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=3326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cisco Easy VPN is not a new technology. Actually it is pretty old, but still used by many companies or people to connect remote site / remote workers to headquarter.</p> <p>A few days ago I was looking to connect a remote site in a simple way but still secure and a colleagues suggested me to use Easy VPN. It supposed to be a simple configuration and it was after solving all issues that came into play.</p> <p>First of all, I needed an Easy VPN Router(client) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/09/cisco-easy-vpn-router-to-router/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interface software loop</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/08/interface-software-loop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/08/interface-software-loop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface soft loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loop testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=3165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you ever worked in an environment where you have to deal with leased / dedicated lines provider by your SP (service provider) then you know that whenever it&#8217;s a problem on the line they request, if possible, to put a loop on the line from one end toward the other end, so they can do some measurements. Usually from my experience with SP, this is a standard approach in case that they don&#8217;t know exactly what problem is with your line or where the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2011/08/interface-software-loop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco: Port-channel load-balancing explanation [Part I]</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2010/08/cisco-port-channel-load-balancing-explanation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2010/08/cisco-port-channel-load-balancing-explanation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco-switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dst-ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dst-mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dst-mixed-ip-port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dst-port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load-balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port-channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port-channel load-balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-dst-ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-dst-mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-dst-mixed-ip-port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-dst-port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-mixed-ip-port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[src-port]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=2868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Port-channel (or etherchannel) is a great way to increase the transport capacity between 2 switches or between a switch and an end device that suport load balancing (e.g. server). Today I don&#8217;t want to focus on how the Port-channel are configured, but more on how they load-balance the traffic over the multiple interfaces included in a bundle.</p> <p>To configure the port-channel load balance, you have to be in the config mode and issue:</p> <p>port-channel load-balance method</p> <p>or</p> <p>port-channel load-balance method module slot </p> <p>the method [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2010/08/cisco-port-channel-load-balancing-explanation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco: Policy Routing with IP SLA</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2010/05/cisco-policy-routing-with-ip-sla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2010/05/cisco-policy-routing-with-ip-sla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 12:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boolean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default route]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigabitEthernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP SLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP SLA configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rtr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=2686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s assume that you have a Cisco router with 2 ISP connection. The first one it&#8217;s a 10Mbps connection with a decent latency and the second one it&#8217;s a 2Mbps connection with quite high latency.</p> <p>Since you don&#8217;t want to load balance over this 2 connections for the obvious reasons described above, you decide to to use the 10Mbps connection as the primary link and the 2Mbps one as a backup, just in case that the primary link fails.</p> <p>You have no dynamic routing protocol, just a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2010/05/cisco-policy-routing-with-ip-sla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco: How to configure HSRP</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/09/cisco-how-to-configure-hsrp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/09/cisco-how-to-configure-hsrp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot standby router protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsrp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=1840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In this post I proposed to discuss a little bit about Hot Standby Router Protocol and how it can be configured on a Cisco device. For this I have chosen the following topology:</p> <p><a title="Cisco HSRP configuration" href="http://cdn.firstdigest.com/swf/cisco-routing/cisco-hsrp/cisco-configure-hsrp.pdf" target="_blank"></a></p> <p>I had in mind this scenario due to the fact that the traffic can take multiple paths in case of link being down and this give us the possibility to have a little bit of conversation on HSRP topic.<br /> HSRP is defined in the document [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/09/cisco-how-to-configure-hsrp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco: OSPF conditional inject of a Default Route</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/06/cisco-ospf-conditional-inject-of-a-default-route/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/06/cisco-ospf-conditional-inject-of-a-default-route/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default route]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ospf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=1452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I believe most of you are familiar how OSPF is injecting a default route in a normal area. If not, you can find <a title="How OSPF Injects a Default Route into a Normal Area" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801ec9f0.shtml" target="_blank">here</a> all the documentation that you need. Please be familiar with this concept before reading this article.</p> <p>Now, let&#8217;s assume that we have the following topology (click on image to have a more detailed view) :<a title="Cisco OSPF conditional default route topology" href="http://cdn.firstdigest.com/swf/cisco-routing/cisco-ospf-conditional-default-route/cisco-ospf-conditional-default-route.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[1452]"></a></p> <p>As you can see we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/06/cisco-ospf-conditional-inject-of-a-default-route/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco: How to selective drop packets without using an access-list</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/03/cisco-how-to-selective-drop-packets-without-using-an-access-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/03/cisco-how-to-selective-drop-packets-without-using-an-access-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access-list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[match]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[match not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy-map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The title actually was a request that I encounter during my CCIE RS preparation. Of course, that in the real world, I would go straight forward and implement an access-list do drop selected packets. But since the lab environment is different for the real one, you might get a task like the above one.</p> <p>Let&#8217;s assume that we have a network topology with a central router (R1) that connects 2 routers (R2 and R3), like in a hub and spoke diagram. Communication between R2 and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/03/cisco-how-to-selective-drop-packets-without-using-an-access-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco: Engineer&#8217;s trick to avoid suboptimal path</title>
		<link>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/01/cisco-engineers-trick-to-avoid-suboptimal-path/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/01/cisco-engineers-trick-to-avoid-suboptimal-path/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco-routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bgp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community-list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimal path]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prefix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[route-map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing and Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suboptimal path]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstdigest.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was explaining in <a title="Optimal path dirty trick" href="http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/01/cisco-dirty-trick-to-force-optimal-path-in-routed-environment/" target="_self">the previous post</a> what is the difference between optimal and suboptimal path and how to avoid the use of not such a good path in your routed environment. Also there I presented this so call &#8220;dirty trick&#8221; you can use to force the routing protocol to choose the path that you want, based on the Administrative distance modification.</p> <p></p> <p>As I said there is another way (for sure more than one) to do it, using [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstdigest.com/2009/01/cisco-engineers-trick-to-avoid-suboptimal-path/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via cdn.firstdigest.com

Served from: www.firstdigest.com @ 2012-02-08 08:35:15 -->
